![]() These are legitimate concerns that need to be addressed, or we risk being blinded to the deeper faults and faulty logic endemic to all and any tech that even hints at an incremental improvement to the online experience, but fails to deliver on a foundational level. In many ways, the business model on which Brave operates is more contradictory and potentially more redundant than the current Internet. Regardless, Brave, in our view, raises more questions than answers about the broader progress and direction of technology and the online experience. ![]() That isn’t Brave’s fault.Īs a result, despite the impressive technical pedigree common to Brave and the Brave team, their final product has been, and will continue to be, shaped by the broader mistakes, morals and capsized mores of an aggressively centralised mainstream economy - again, not their fault. This is due to issues of centralisation - either operationally or as a result of centralised economics models (that are, admittedly, until the Deconomy comes into play, the only option). The issue is that on a conceptual level Brave cannot escape the restrictive linear business model that is common to all online and offline businesses. To be fair, Brave, unlike the big tech incumbents… you know who you are… is not, at least in our estimation, deliberately and mendaciously exploiting users for either centralised control or economic advantage. Brave browser: Commercial concerns or privacy concerns come first?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |